<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2009 Grammy Nominations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/2009/12/2009-grammy-nominations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/2009/12/2009-grammy-nominations/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=2009-grammy-nominations</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 22:23:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lochner</title>
		<link>http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/2009/12/2009-grammy-nominations/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lochner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/?p=4345#comment-997</guid>
		<description>I agree about Hooper. I think it&#039;s strictly because it&#039;s the movie. You&#039;re probably right about &quot;Married Life.&quot; That category occasionally goes to a film score track, but your name usually has to be Williams to win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about Hooper. I think it&#8217;s strictly because it&#8217;s the movie. You&#8217;re probably right about &#8220;Married Life.&#8221; That category occasionally goes to a film score track, but your name usually has to be Williams to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Garland</title>
		<link>http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/2009/12/2009-grammy-nominations/#comment-996</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Garland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 21:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/?p=4345#comment-996</guid>
		<description>Leo. Should have known. Got one of those at home. But nobody messes with Cancer. We don&#039;t bait. Just pinch and scuttle sideways, if that. (Some of us ARE rational.) Unfortunately, Mom&#039;s an Aries, so she&#039;ll make me regret my momentary lapse of reason and come back. 

But back to the Grammys. NIcholas Hooper? Nicholas Hooper?! And if Giacchino doesn&#039;t win Instrumental Composition for &quot;Married Life,&quot; I&#039;ve got some voters in my crosshairs. But it&#039;ll likely go to one of the other Jazz or Big Band nominees. Ah, well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leo. Should have known. Got one of those at home. But nobody messes with Cancer. We don&#8217;t bait. Just pinch and scuttle sideways, if that. (Some of us ARE rational.) Unfortunately, Mom&#8217;s an Aries, so she&#8217;ll make me regret my momentary lapse of reason and come back. </p>
<p>But back to the Grammys. NIcholas Hooper? Nicholas Hooper?! And if Giacchino doesn&#8217;t win Instrumental Composition for &#8220;Married Life,&#8221; I&#8217;ve got some voters in my crosshairs. But it&#8217;ll likely go to one of the other Jazz or Big Band nominees. Ah, well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lochner</title>
		<link>http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/2009/12/2009-grammy-nominations/#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lochner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/?p=4345#comment-995</guid>
		<description>Steve, I guess my threaded comments in Wordpress only thread so far. I&#039;ll grant you that the AMPAS voting procedures suck. I won&#039;t take the &quot;Requiem&quot; bait. I love you/hate you too. LOL And we didn&#039;t go anywhere. We allow each other our opinions. And as a Leo, mine are right, yours are wrong. The sooner you realize that, the easier this will all be. ;) Say hi to mom for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, I guess my threaded comments in WordPress only thread so far. I&#8217;ll grant you that the AMPAS voting procedures suck. I won&#8217;t take the &#8220;Requiem&#8221; bait. I love you/hate you too. LOL And we didn&#8217;t go anywhere. We allow each other our opinions. And as a Leo, mine are right, yours are wrong. The sooner you realize that, the easier this will all be. ;) Say hi to mom for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Garland</title>
		<link>http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/2009/12/2009-grammy-nominations/#comment-994</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Garland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/?p=4345#comment-994</guid>
		<description>The AMPAS voting procedures suck, but &quot;Requiem for a Dream&quot; is one of the films of the decade.

I love you/I hate you. Where did we go wrong/right?

I&#039;ll be at my mother&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The AMPAS voting procedures suck, but &#8220;Requiem for a Dream&#8221; is one of the films of the decade.</p>
<p>I love you/I hate you. Where did we go wrong/right?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be at my mother&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lochner</title>
		<link>http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/2009/12/2009-grammy-nominations/#comment-993</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lochner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/?p=4345#comment-993</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s not even get started on REQUIEM FOR A DREAM, which I think is an overrated, pretentious waste of celluloid. That&#039;s for another blog post. :)

No matter what I think of the song, like I said above, it did fit the tone of the film. Part of the problem with AMPAS&#039;s voting procedure is the song bakeoff where voters are forced to sit through a couple of hours of snippets of songs taken from their exact places within the film. If I had to watch a black and white credit scroll while listening to  2-1/2 minutes (or whatever it is) of that Springsteen song, I wouldn&#039;t have voted for it either. (I&#039;m not sure I&#039;m a big fan of credit or title songs being up either. But if they weren&#039;t, there wouldn&#039;t be ANY nominees.) 

If you&#039;re watching one clip after another, of course you&#039;re more apt to vote for songs and musicals numbers that actually happen in the film (hence recent multiple nominations for DREAMGIRLS and ENCHANTED, and probably a couple from THE PRINCESS AND THE FROG this year). Since AMPAS doesn&#039;t list songwriters on the initial ballot, voters can&#039;t be swayed by seeing someone&#039;s name (a practice I&#039;m not totally behind).  (Though could they NOT tell who was singing?!) Without that visual on paper, you&#039;re left with the song.

And ignoring my opinion, which ultimately doesn&#039;t matter a damn to anyone but me, they apparently weren&#039;t impressed enough to give it the 8.25 average score. (That&#039;s a whole problem in and of itself. Let the top five songs be the nominees, period.)

I still think &quot;Jai Ho&quot; stands the best chance at a Grammy. SLUMDOG is a far more popular film than THE WRESTLER, with or without Springsteen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s not even get started on REQUIEM FOR A DREAM, which I think is an overrated, pretentious waste of celluloid. That&#8217;s for another blog post. :)</p>
<p>No matter what I think of the song, like I said above, it did fit the tone of the film. Part of the problem with AMPAS&#8217;s voting procedure is the song bakeoff where voters are forced to sit through a couple of hours of snippets of songs taken from their exact places within the film. If I had to watch a black and white credit scroll while listening to  2-1/2 minutes (or whatever it is) of that Springsteen song, I wouldn&#8217;t have voted for it either. (I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m a big fan of credit or title songs being up either. But if they weren&#8217;t, there wouldn&#8217;t be ANY nominees.) </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re watching one clip after another, of course you&#8217;re more apt to vote for songs and musicals numbers that actually happen in the film (hence recent multiple nominations for DREAMGIRLS and ENCHANTED, and probably a couple from THE PRINCESS AND THE FROG this year). Since AMPAS doesn&#8217;t list songwriters on the initial ballot, voters can&#8217;t be swayed by seeing someone&#8217;s name (a practice I&#8217;m not totally behind).  (Though could they NOT tell who was singing?!) Without that visual on paper, you&#8217;re left with the song.</p>
<p>And ignoring my opinion, which ultimately doesn&#8217;t matter a damn to anyone but me, they apparently weren&#8217;t impressed enough to give it the 8.25 average score. (That&#8217;s a whole problem in and of itself. Let the top five songs be the nominees, period.)</p>
<p>I still think &#8220;Jai Ho&#8221; stands the best chance at a Grammy. SLUMDOG is a far more popular film than THE WRESTLER, with or without Springsteen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Garland</title>
		<link>http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/2009/12/2009-grammy-nominations/#comment-992</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Garland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 19:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/?p=4345#comment-992</guid>
		<description>Overrated, I agree, although I deeply admire Aronosfsky&#039;s talent. I haven&#039;t loved all of his films, and at least one I&#039;ve loathed (&quot;Pi,&quot; in case you&#039;re wondering), but anyone with talent like his, and specifically vision enough to create &quot;Requiem for a Dream,&quot; gets about as many free passes in my book as he&#039;d like. 

However, &quot;The Wrestler&quot; didn&#039;t require my complete dispensation. Rourke was fearless and Tomei was solid, and the entire affair was itself a rather moving requiem of sorts. If you didn&#039;t buy it, then I can understand an impartiality to the song, but it was so simple and so weary and spoke so precisely to the narrative that I should be surprised that the Music Branch didn&#039;t nominate it, but alas, I no longer am with their recent track record. 

Thank goodness that NARAS is around to rectify the error.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overrated, I agree, although I deeply admire Aronosfsky&#8217;s talent. I haven&#8217;t loved all of his films, and at least one I&#8217;ve loathed (&#8220;Pi,&#8221; in case you&#8217;re wondering), but anyone with talent like his, and specifically vision enough to create &#8220;Requiem for a Dream,&#8221; gets about as many free passes in my book as he&#8217;d like. </p>
<p>However, &#8220;The Wrestler&#8221; didn&#8217;t require my complete dispensation. Rourke was fearless and Tomei was solid, and the entire affair was itself a rather moving requiem of sorts. If you didn&#8217;t buy it, then I can understand an impartiality to the song, but it was so simple and so weary and spoke so precisely to the narrative that I should be surprised that the Music Branch didn&#8217;t nominate it, but alas, I no longer am with their recent track record. </p>
<p>Thank goodness that NARAS is around to rectify the error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lochner</title>
		<link>http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/2009/12/2009-grammy-nominations/#comment-991</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lochner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/?p=4345#comment-991</guid>
		<description>Bland melody, dull lyrics. A real snoozer IMO. Though I will admit it fit the tone of Aranovsky&#039;s overrated film (with two excellent lead performances).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bland melody, dull lyrics. A real snoozer IMO. Though I will admit it fit the tone of Aranovsky&#8217;s overrated film (with two excellent lead performances).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Garland</title>
		<link>http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/2009/12/2009-grammy-nominations/#comment-990</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Garland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/?p=4345#comment-990</guid>
		<description>The UNMEMORABLE &quot;The Wrestler&quot;?! Jim, can I see you for a minute?..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UNMEMORABLE &#8220;The Wrestler&#8221;?! Jim, can I see you for a minute?..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lochner</title>
		<link>http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/2009/12/2009-grammy-nominations/#comment-989</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lochner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/?p=4345#comment-989</guid>
		<description>Dude, how can you not have seen UP? You even have kids! LOL Go get that DVD and prepare to be enchanted. By the movie AND the score.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, how can you not have seen UP? You even have kids! LOL Go get that DVD and prepare to be enchanted. By the movie AND the score.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lochner</title>
		<link>http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/2009/12/2009-grammy-nominations/#comment-988</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lochner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.filmscoreclicktrack.com/?p=4345#comment-988</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s the &quot;Comment Luv&quot; plugin you see with the little heart underneath the &quot;Submit Comment&quot; button. It&#039;s a nifty little plugin that helps publicize the blogs of all of you who comment. Hopefully it will generate more traffic for you guys. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s the &#8220;Comment Luv&#8221; plugin you see with the little heart underneath the &#8220;Submit Comment&#8221; button. It&#8217;s a nifty little plugin that helps publicize the blogs of all of you who comment. Hopefully it will generate more traffic for you guys. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

